We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
Looks good to me.
I don't think they're real. Also, Midge signed it May 30th 1963 instead of 30th May 1963.
I wouldn't want this item whether it were real or not but in the UK it is not that unusual to write May 30th rather than 30th May. Very good day by the way - my birthday. I was exactly one year old when this was or wasn't signed.
Why doesn't it have a REAL COA?
This looks okay to me.
on the fence with this one. the Paul looks very strange to me
I agree, the Paul especially does not look like him. All but John could have been signed on the run, but I wouldn't consider it OK unless I could see similar exemplars to compare to.
I like it...
I trust your and Ballroom's opinion on Beatles over mine. That Paul really looks off in many ways. Do either of you have examples showing the "L" being that much larger than the "P"? and the last name just looks off to me
I also dont like the Paul and its a lot of money
It doesn’t looker larger to me. It’s awkwardly signed and the baseline changes after the “U”. Look at what happened with the “T”.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service