We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Is this Harrison authentic?

Views: 1767

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What an interesting signature. Hopefully the members who know Beatles better than me will chime in, but I think it is real.

It looks really flowing..
I don't like that there is not a clear 'r' in the 'george' part of the signature. Like as if it is signed 'geoge'
First half of the sig looks ok but the middle of Harrison to the end really gets sloppy.never seen this before.could be real?

I agree, Rob, it really flows, and looks spontaneous to me. I see a taste of the 'R' there, but if this is real, it's on-the-fly. Think what our signatures can look like rushed. Heck, mine looks similar to Pacino's more often than not.

Or maybe he had had one too many, given what it is signed on :-)

I'm not so sure about this one.

George is a extremely tough signer to pin down. A lot off the Genesis books that I've seen are all different. Sorry can't be much help.

I think it's likely authentic.

My opinion: I'm going to lean OK. "George" looks fine. "Harrison" is definitely rushed, which makes it troubling. I would DEFINITELY get opinions from Roger and/or PAAS.

I think it is real. A lot of his in-persons look a bit rushed and the lose Some of their regular characteristics.
I think this one is authentic. I really believe I've seen this "style" before. I'd be interested to know what Roger thinks.

im not to keen on it,i nudge to the not authentic,,yes agree with the what i would call the [too loose]characteristic element of it

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service