Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on January 19, 2016 at 8:12pm

It's tough because of the condition of the signature, but the Lennon portion doesn't look correct to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MusicJim on January 26, 2016 at 6:32am

thanks Ballroom.. I appreciate the input..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on January 19, 2016 at 8:21pm

It could be a copy of a genuine signature, printed and then wet. I have seen this done before by scammers. But you would have to get someone who knows John Lennon's signature traites to advise you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MusicJim on January 26, 2016 at 6:32am

thank you for your opinion on this piece!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on January 19, 2016 at 8:47pm

I agree, the Lennon portion doesn't look right.something about the stokes on the n's that seem off.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on January 19, 2016 at 9:02pm

I don't think this is real. I also don't like the o and h in the first name.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 19, 2016 at 10:50pm

Whatever it is, it ain't right.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MusicJim on January 26, 2016 at 6:33am

after review.. I agree.. thanks Steve

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on January 20, 2016 at 7:17am

Looks to be a copy...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MusicJim on January 26, 2016 at 6:33am

thanks for taking the time to comment Jim.. I appreciate it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on January 26, 2016 at 6:59am

It isn't right and if you look, it is 1 of 10 copies anyway!

• ▶ Reply