We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

What do people make of this '62 Beatles set? At first viewing the Harrison doesn't look good.

I spent some time studying other examples from 1962 and have come to the conclusion that it's probably okay. Certainly not a typical example but sharing several common traits with other Harrison autographs from the period. 

What do you think?

Tags: Beatles, George, Harrison, John, Lennon, McCartney, Paul, Ringo, Starr, The

Views: 659

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I like the George. Some what  neater than his usual style, The entire set are neat and tidy. Probably signed in a relaxed mood on a firm surface. Actually are real good set of Beatles signatures.

Thanks Spaceman, I'm glad you concur. 

I like this set as well, including the George. Very nice.

I like the signatures but not the yellowing paper.

I think it may be yellowish paper, not simply yellowing.

The sigs are fine. I've seen this one several times...

Thanks guys for your opinions. 

Shows how much I know about Beatles sigs. I've been watching this for a while (live auction on "thesaleroom.com" later today) but I had no intention of bidding as I thought this was another one of those provincial auction house duds. To be more precise, I thought that Paul's signature and inscription were OK but that Paul may have signed for the others too. The other sigs just looked too neat and uniform - pen pressure etc.

I still won't be bidding by the way. 

Here's a better pic:

Thanks Ballroom.

Sold for £2,600 plus fees. That’s a great price for such a Lovely early set. 

A dealer could flip that easy!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service