Hi

Any views on the attached much appreciated, thank you

Views: 884

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I should have attached this COA -
Attachments: No photo uploads here

It looks ok to me, what's your concerns with it?

Thanks Paul. It does seem good but I've learnt to be cautious. Am considering paying a fair bit - around $US2,000 - for the attached. The sig on the photo adds value, for me (compared to a plain signature)
Attachments: No photo uploads here
It looks as though its a magazine signed.
Your from victoria i see!
It's nicely framed.
Yes. Chilly Vic!

Hello. It has more than decent placement and contrast, but some collectors believe a magazine photo should not be worth the same as a chemical lab photograph, which is much more durable and more lightfast. $2,000 USD for a signed magazine photo? I don't know. I looked quickly at closed R&R - no ALS over $1700 including very recent auctions. SP signed magazine photo Nov 10 for $763.

Sure, most of the money is in the framing. You could almost buy a 60s set for around the same price, almost.
True. I am long-time Jones fan so keen for a good one.
Thanks. Good point re photo v. Magazine page.

I'm told the glass is Conservation, 99%.

I realise I'd be paying for the framing, which is nice but which I could get done myself; and what I perceive as scarcity of good signed pics (borne out by R&R?)
Tracks uk has some stones items for sale. It is a nice one your looking at.
Buy what you like.If you buy it you will have to pay tax on it unless he marks it down for you.
Thanks. Good point re tax - I'll check with vendor - and will look at Tracks. I know I could get framing done here through a framer I use for no more than $300 si I don't want too much for that factored in to his price

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service