Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John Spillane on January 18, 2019 at 8:12am

Pretty sure you're good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 18, 2019 at 11:54am

no good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Spillane on January 18, 2019 at 4:23pm

I'll try to save a little face here. I thought the autograph was rushed. A little sloppy. Saw a few characteristics that made me think it might be ok. I was wrong. Thanks, to all for the continued education. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on January 18, 2019 at 5:01pm

That's how we learn, John, and that's why we're here.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on January 18, 2019 at 1:17pm

Not authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on January 18, 2019 at 1:21pm

I recognize that-style forgery.  I have two dozen of that-style forgery in my files.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on January 18, 2019 at 1:24pm

Here's one of those from my files.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Woody2Shoes on January 23, 2019 at 12:56pm

Chris wrote: "Here's one of those from my files." 

Very helpful example, as always. Thank you, Chris!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on January 23, 2019 at 1:46pm

You're welcome, Woody.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on February 21, 2019 at 3:01pm

A rare "Comnerce (not Commerce) Comet" version!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on January 18, 2019 at 1:31pm

Fake. 

Signature aside, does anyone think the Mick was sending out Strawberry Shortcake style Christmas cards? ;-)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by phillip on January 18, 2019 at 1:59pm

Thanks for all the quick responces and info guys!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page