We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Need expert (and non-expert) opinions please!!  Thanks!

Views: 406

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Something tells me it's fine.

Hmm. Why is it questionable?

What happened to my comment? Anyway, Sometimes it's trickier to determine it's authenticity when you're looking at a thick signature. Just making sure the formation is there. I'm more used to looking at a much thinner blue or black ink signed ball or picture. That's just me. Like I said before, I think its fine.

Thanks for your thoughts!

I would not touch it. Rollercoaster baseline among other issues.

This is the kind of post and thread I've been looking for. Steve, please elaborate on your rollercoaster baseline. 

I think the signature's fine for a few reasons. Would I touch it? No. Am I 100% sure it's authentic? No. But I'm leaning towards it. This doesn't stick out as a no doubt about it forgery. This is the kind of stuff that I love learning from.

Same here!  Thank you John and Steve! Please elaborate

Signatures on fabric are always a challenge. That said, the wavy baseline is not a good sign. Also, the overly exaggerated top of the K is atypical. The “ickey” and “antle” look too tall relative to the Ms. To me, the whole thing looks off. Like a slightly distorted funhouse mirror version of an authentic example.

Thank you, Steve! Great stuff!

Thank you

video says restricted though

What do you agree about?  Thanks

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service