We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Need your opinion on these Mickey Mantle Autos

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bo on November 13, 2012 at 1:58pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bo on November 13, 2012 at 2:01pm

Hey guys!! I would like for you all to look at these two mantle autos. They were signed in Atlanta in the 1980's. If some of you autograph professionals could give me some feed back to these two, that would be great!! Thanks

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Null on November 13, 2012 at 2:29pm

Not a Mantle expert by any means, but the bottom one looks weird to me. Also weird he would sign 1952 if he it was signed in the 1980s?

There are several people on here who are great at spotting fake Mantles, hopefully they see this discussion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bo on November 13, 2012 at 3:15pm

I'm sorry I didn't make it clear I'm not sure when the 1952 Team photo was signed. I would guess it was not signed in 1952 due to the blue sharpie he used. But the Perez-Steele and his biography that I have were both signed in atlanta in the 1980s. I will post the book auto soon. Thanks

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bo on November 13, 2012 at 6:19pm

Hey everyone. I was hoping I would get a few more opinions on these mantle autographs. Any input would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Null on November 14, 2012 at 6:34am

Bo, post the pix in this discussion: http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/mantle-williams-and-...

You will likely get more responses there.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tylor on November 14, 2012 at 3:04pm

top 1 is real bottom 1 looks fake/forged

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 14, 2012 at 4:25pm

the first one is probably ok, but the second one has me baffled. I would not buy it, real or not.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on November 14, 2012 at 4:39pm

The first one looks ok, but the second one I would stay away from. You can see several areas where there are lighter and darker spots, especially in the l and e in Mantle. The connection of the c and the k in Mickey is very bad. The c normally becomes the left side of the k and here it is separate with another little line added, then the right part of the k.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by scott stimell on December 2, 2012 at 4:46pm

perez steele is good the team photo mantle is BAD!!! NO QUESTION THE FIRST IS GOOD.. -SCOTT

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 2, 2012 at 5:39pm

Yay my first post-Anyway,I had a perez -steele in person that is exactly signed like that one, def good.The second one the forger had trouble with the second half of his Ms and the E.