that's pretty wacked out
I have never seen anything in the world of authentic that resembles those
Ginger's sig can get a bit crazy, but not that crazy
Jack's can be simple but not that simple
Looks like Eric's at least had some thought put into it
Wait for others to comment
Luv Cream... in fact that's what's playing right now. I'll turn it up so you can here it.
1967.... actually yours aren't too far off. This Baker is more wacked than yours posted
That Jack Bruce threw me off
Yours posted might actually be good. My apologies.
wait for other comments
Damn, that would be cool. Where did you find that photo? I can only see it partially for some reason, I'm dying to see it
They are from RR auction files
I don't have photo's of my personal sigs at hand
But that Jack Bruce just doesn't look like 60's. He did some basic sigs later on but not this simple. Maybe it was added. It's confusing me.
The Cream signed page in the original post is genuine in my opinion, very nice example...
Thx for steppn in mc, much appreciated
I jumped the gun with that Bruce sig. My sincere apologies
That Bruce still confuses me for that time period
It was the clapton that made me rethink it. Looks right
Well christ, I just don't know anymore. Spent $15 and sent the image to PSA to take a look at it and just got a reply back saying it was "likely not genuine" although got an email back from rareandsigned.Com saying it was "absolutely superb" I can't help but notice little ideosyncrasies like the N in "Clapton" hangs down the same in all of them but it would be nice to be able to get a good COA to back it all up. Anyone else notice any good details?