Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on May 6, 2015 at 4:21pm

Paul, are you searching the world for a cheap set of Beatles autographs?

Even I can see that the "Beatles" set you have posted are awful forgeries.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Jones on May 6, 2015 at 4:49pm

Really? I bought a John Lennon autograph off the person who is selling these and the feedback on here was positive see http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/john-lennon-autograp...

What makes you think these are not authentic? are you experienced in beatles autographs?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 6, 2015 at 5:44pm

early 1963

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 6, 2015 at 5:45pm

mid 1963

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 6, 2015 at 5:47pm

late 1963

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 6, 2015 at 5:50pm

late 1963

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Jones on May 6, 2015 at 6:04pm

Hi, so what do you think then please?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 6, 2015 at 6:28pm

my first impression based on the Harrison, was that these were not authentic.  I am still not convinced that they are, and if they are, I would not want them as I think the Harrison is a really poor example.  I did find this set, signed from June to November 1963, where the Harrison exhibits the same sloppy rr that your post does.  very unusual, as he normally loops his r's.  but I am suspicious of the H, as it overlaps the g, which I have never seen before.

I can understand Christopher William's comment as I felt the exact same way on first look.and first look tells a lot about an autograph.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 6, 2015 at 6:33pm

Try to avoid buying controversial autographs. But examples that are widely liked.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on May 6, 2015 at 7:31pm

What Mr. Jones should be doing is spending a few months to learn Beatles autographs instead of posting everything from A-Z.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on May 6, 2015 at 8:05pm

It looks authentic to me, but I agree about the George signature. It isn't the nicest example. I've seen the same formation of the "H."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Jones on May 6, 2015 at 9:00pm

Thats reassuring thanks, surely the George signature not being the nicest example is a subjective thing, guess there could be collectors who prefer this example, to be fair as long as they are authentic that's all that matters, Mr Cyrkin recommended yourself as being the go to man on the Beatles so thank you for responding, As you can see above a earlier poster described these as  "awful forgeries" seemingly not the case though, glad I waited for a respected person who actually knows what they are talking about to respond. Thank you once again sir.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page