We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Collecting the Wright Brothers, Right or Wrong?

Most philographers (autograph collectors) who collect the autographs of the Wright Brothers know that there were more than just Orville (1871-1948) and Wilbur (1867-1912). Reuchlin Wright (1861-1920) and Lorin Wright (1862-1939) were Wilbur and Orville's older brothers. There was even a sister, Katharine Wright (1874-1929).

In "The Sanders Autograph Price Guide 7th edition" published in 2009 (I co-wrote Chapter 1 "Authentication"), a bank check signed by Orville is valued at $500-$700. One signed by Wilbur is listed at $1930-$2795. The values depended upon how the check was signed. A bank cancellation hole almost always obliterates part of the signature on early Wright checks. The signature of the payee if endorsed on verso may also increase the value. For example, a check payable to and endorsed by Charles E. Taylor (1868-1956), the builder of the Wright Flyer's engine, is especially desirable.

Early checks were signed by Orville "Wright Cycle Co./ow"

and by Wilbur "Wright Cycle Co./ww." At times, Wilbur's "W" resembled Orville's "W."

Later, Orville would sign "Wright Brothers/ow"

and Wilbur would sign "Wright Brothers/ww" with his usual "W" which differed greatly from Orville's.

As the company's business manager, Lorin would sign business checks "Wright Brothers"

and "Orville Wright/L."

It's not difficult to spot a Lorin Wright check.
Lorin's "W" differs greatly from Orville's "W" and Wilbur's "W."
A loop at the start of the initial stroke of the "W" is always present when Lorin signs.

This is an Orville Wright signature signed by Orville.

This is not a remarkable discovery or breaking news to which autograph collectors have recently been alerted ... and a check signed "Orville Wright" by Lorin is not a check signed by a secretary, it is signed by a Wright Brother, albeit Lorin, not Orville.

One more very important word to the wise: When a writer of an autograph article or study alerts you that an autograph is not authentic, saying that he has compared a questioned signature to "known genuine examples," who has authenticated those "known genuine examples"?

0 members like this