We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Being an active collector of autographs and in the archival framing industry since the 1980s, it amazes me what I see when I remove autographs from most frames. It is very common to find household (acidic) tape and regular non UV glass contained inside frames. ANd, I have never seen 4 ply museum grade cotton rag for matting AND backing on these important autographs - NEVER!
Framers should know better when framing original autographs and documents. After all, these items are one-of-a-kind and valuable.
My purpose in writing this is to inform collectors and dealers on what they need to tell their framer when having their items framed.
Over the years, many collectors have sent me their framed autographs out of concern for how they are mounted and framed. And, although I have seen a few autographs properly framed to irreversible standards, the vast majority have had poor materials and workmanship. To the point where the autograph suffered irreparable harm!
The incremental costs of framing it correctly is very little. Yes, wholesale costs to purchase true museum quality materials versus regular materials is negligible. Anyone telling you otherwise is either lacking in knowledge or not stating the facts.
First, in a lot of cases, I notice the frame shop will indicate that UV glass or plexiglass was used, when actually it wasn't. Though this is blatant dishonesty, this indicates that you must fully trust the framer and instill how important the correct materials are for important framing applications.
Secondly, most framers inherently assume "acid free" matboards marketed as such are good for autographs.
Nothing can be further from the truth!
Without question, every single time I have removed, marked as "acid free", I have noticed a mat burn stain where the matting was placed. "Acid free" mats are made entirely of wood pulp low grade materials! These materials will create a mat stain, as mentioned, on the paper item.
Only insist on 100% pure cotton rag mats. Only these mats and similar backing should only come in contact with the document or autograph.
A few months back, I brought a framed autograph I'd purchased years earlier (that turned out to be a forgery) to a local framer so that they could replaced the forgery photo with an authentic one. The photo had originally been framed at Hobby Lobby. The place I brought it to for the reframing had been in business and run by the same family for a century. While they re-used the frame, the new photo received a new matting. They included the original photo in a sleeve and gave it to me when I picked up the item later. I was shocked to see that Hobby lobby had taped the original photo to the matte. Good thing it was a forgery.
True. Most frame shops should disclose how things are mounted and the materials used, if you can trust them. I have seen too many autographs get ruined from improper framing. This is why most collectors avoid framing.
Trust and knowledge are key components of preservation framing
Hi what an interesting & informative blog. I am interested in purchasing a poster that says it has been mounted onto foamcore. I'm assuming after reading this excellent bog that this could cause potential problems . Does foamcore have a different name in England? Thanks for writing such useful article
Avoid purchasing fine art or autographs mounted on backing board that cannot be easily removed. Depending on the backing and the adhesive used for mounting, acids in either can penetrate through the poster over time. Of course, this depends on exposure to light, heat and humidity which will accelerate the process reacting to the acids.
Plus these boards, regardless of description, out gas over time to pollute the art. This will alter the appearance subtly over time.
This is why your so called "acid free" mat boards will discolor over time. Reaction to acids cause them to "stir up" and bleed from the matting or backing.
I am sure foam core goes by the same name in the UK.
I have a question about composed frames (picture+autograph beside)
For exemple a composition like this (from internet) makes me wonder:
To cover a document signed with a paper with a "small window" that let see the only signature is not dangerous? I think this could fade the squared area around the sign while the rest of the document retains the original colors.. I think that after few years the document could be ruined by an irregular wear color.. What do you think? Thank you
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
You need to be a member of Autograph Live to add comments!
Join Autograph Live