Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Chris Dwyer on April 7, 2017 at 6:57pm

Didn't buy it yet

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2017 at 6:58pm

I don't think Chris bought it - I hope not. Chris - have you read the signature studies at UACC and RR? What did you make of those exemplars and the signature on this menu?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on April 7, 2017 at 3:51pm

GFA, AAU and Antiquities is basically the forgery industry hat trick. I wouldn't give that autograph or anything from any one of those three sources a second thought.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chris Dwyer on April 7, 2017 at 5:09pm

So stating the seller and the certifiers pretty much determined straight off that bat that this piece has no
Merit even if there's a possibility of it being genuine
Thank you

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2017 at 5:21pm

Not what I said at all in my last post. 

"The larger names, and this is among them, require much careful study and often the opinions of several experts to avoid trouble. I don't suggest buying without those measures, and certainly not based on any certificate alone."

I said NOT to rely on any certificate. That works both ways to me. This signature has problems, that is first. In this case the autograph is a "dream item" at absurd price, signature is very problematic, the source troublesome at best and the authenticators not worth discussing in my opinion. If you think you can buy an authentic strong Monroe on that sort of item with those certificates from that seller for that price, there is...little one can say. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on April 7, 2017 at 5:43pm

It's a forgery. Even if it was authentic which it isn't those three connections kill the value of it. Only new or unsuspecting collectors would consider that. If it were real it would have been sent to PSA and quadrupled the resale value.

Sounds like you need a lot of convincing. It's your money. Your right to piss it away if you want to.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on April 7, 2017 at 6:59pm

+1

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 7, 2017 at 7:24pm

Chris,

It doesn't look real to me either. It has a very basic similarity to her autograph, but in my opinion it's not her handwriting.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2017 at 7:56pm

Chris, what would you think if I tried to sell you a 1918 $5000 bill, still valued at $5000 today, for $750? What your response be?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chris Dwyer on April 7, 2017 at 7:58pm

I have a deed for the
San frasisco bridge how about a trade

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2017 at 8:00pm

So, why is this menu any different? Bear in mind, you were first to question this signature, and you were the first to highlight a real problem with a scan.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chris Dwyer on April 7, 2017 at 8:03pm

I was just trying to get a simple answer of
yes it's authentic or
Nope sorry
That's all
Pretty simple

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 10
• Next ›
• Page