Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on November 22, 2020 at 7:02pm

It doesn't feel right to me (too neat and clear). I'd pass until a better example comes along.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 22, 2020 at 7:56pm

That image looks intentionally slightly blurry. Get a large, sharp image. From what I see, though, I don't think Lennon signed it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on November 22, 2020 at 8:40pm

Looks as though its a fake lennon!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on November 23, 2020 at 11:29am

No thanks...don't like it...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 23, 2020 at 11:36am

I dont like it either

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 23, 2020 at 1:53pm

Here it is along with two authentic examples. It looks pretty close.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 23, 2020 at 2:32pm

That is scary. They are too close 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 23, 2020 at 2:33pm

I thought it looked good, the "h" and "L" relationship and those two ink blobs at the tops. Your exemplars don't have them but I have seen them. I just am not totally used to this "J" but appears good. Is there a year for this style?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 23, 2020 at 2:52pm

The middle one is from February, 1969, and the bottom one January, 1974.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 23, 2020 at 3:32pm

Thanks. I tried to make the OP a bit more visible:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 23, 2020 at 3:49pm

Thanks. It's not that. It's that ones that are light and electronically faded like that one are usually problem ones. Copies, etc.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chris Roberts on November 23, 2020 at 3:50pm

Well I was leaning towards authentic, but now looking at this is kinda the nail in the coffin....Unless someone is THAT good at forging...

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page