Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo 2 hours ago

This is James Mason c. 1978:

This is...not.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HEITS_UTV 2 hours ago

Without wishing to add to the pile on, I reckon I know exactly who sold all of the items from their “mother’s collection”- because I fell for it too. I have no idea whether she genuinely believes her mother’s items were authentic, but the collection is/was absolutely vast, yet it’s obvious that a lot of the items share common tells if you spend long enough examining them.

I’m not going to bother going into the details of the item I purchased because they’re available via my posting history, but Beckett unsurprisingly rejected my item. I did, however, get a Paypal refund when I asked the seller for one- I suggest the buyer does the same ASAP.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle 1 hour ago

well good to know you got a refund,  I suspect the person who sold 'their mother's collection' must have known because the Waterstones story is very unlikely which she would have known if she was uk based

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by HEITS_UTV 1 hour ago

Definitely the same person now you’ve told me that- can’t believe I fell for it, but their grift was in its infancy a couple of years ago. They’ve flooded the market since then and the fact they’re forgeries is so blatant when you compare one with any other.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 14 minutes ago

That would mean that this character either found or was provided images of authentic items that appear to have been used as examples to forge the writing and signatures on the Beatles signed sheet music, and he didn’t see any issue. The images are included in the auction listing.

https://ebay.us/m/lpMrOB

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 8
• 9
• 10
• Next ›
• Page