Authenticity is Everything
Fleetwood Mac - any good ????????????????
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Mick Jones
-
If you would sstop ripping people off but are a Con Man but better yet I just spoke to the police department in your area and they are aware of the fraud you are perpetrating !!!
-
Permalink Reply by Josh Board NEW & Improved
-
And again, these folks already did you a big solid. They told you some of the reasons WHY your stuff was so easily spotted as fake. A style of signature from the early 60s done in the late 60s. So now you'll know how to properly trick people in the future.
Oh, and as to your response about your happy customers that are too afraid to state their opinions because of bullies -- also makes no sense. They probably aren't even on here, or aren't experts, so what would they have to prove you correct in selling an authentic item?
-
Permalink Reply by Jason H
-
Im not interested in Fleetwood Mac so I haven't been paying attention much to this thread. Just caught up now and WOW... I am too exhausted to really dig through this sellers stuff until tomorrow but quickly searched sold items for signatures I know. I won't give any of my own opinions, whatever they are worth, without more reaserch.. but... Tell me if I'm wrong, the first one I click on to look closer, Bon Jovi... Is this a stop and start mark or am I seeing things?
-
-
Just for reference, here is a full set of signatures from Bowie’s Outside Tour band, obtained in person, by me, in Prague on 3 February 1996:
Top row: Peter Schwartz, Mike Garson, Reeves Gabrels, Carlos Alomar.
Bottom row: Zachary Alford, Gail Ann Dorsey, George Simms.
Peter’s signature is particularly rare to find on items from this tour. He was so anonymous to all but the most hardcore of fans that few people bothered to ask for his autograph. It is the only signature missing from the tour programme posted earlier.
-
-
Ok come on, this Ghostbusters item is comical. How can this be explained? Dan somehow completely stopped his signature clockwise "a" that's 100% present in all his handwriting, not just signature, from as far back as the early 70s that I've researched and still is true today.. whoever forged this must have been trying to copy one of Dan's secretarial signatures and hacked it. Everything is completely off in general.
-
-
After just a very quick scan of the listings I am actually wondering if there is one single authentically-signed item in the whole collection.
-
-
I can't sleep, still up and on my phone but I can't look at this garbage anymore, stopped right after my last post. It's just not worth the effort and others are right about giving secrets away. Although I've written about Dan many times to help people avoid his ttm secretarials. His "a" is just one aspect out of many tells, as are Bill and Ernie. I'm surprised there was no Ramis to bump it up another $1000 but I guess the forger was too worried about THAT aspect causing a red flag lol... I feel it's not a problem to mention Dan's "a" on here because id hope that everyone should know that aspect by now. Even TPAs somehow let his secretarial slip and that's the easiest instant tell.. This clown is way off on everything regardless of the a...
It amazes me how someone can be willing to defend trash on here to people who know better. I don't believe this person's items or story. Just another fraud who thinks he's smarter than everyone. I think eBay feedback and lack of repercussions has gotten to his head.
-
-
Here's another thing. When he refers to us as "bullies" or whatever -- it's kind of like when the dumb women on the show The View, argued about Bill Cosby. Whoopie Goldberg said she knew him and because of that, didn't believe all the women accusing him of rape. And Joy Behar, in one of the rare times she said something intelligent, replied, "So, these 50 women just all got together one day and said 'Listen, here's what we're gonna do. We're going to accuse Cosby of drugging and raping us."
Does this person think that's what we want to do? Attack some new member on this site because we're bullies? No. If somebody joined here, and had great stories, authentic autographies, etc...we'd welcome them with open arms (no Journey reference intended...although I'm sure that guy has some Journey autographs for sale)
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo
-
This is Richard Burton by noted photographer and signed by Richard Burton in 1956 from The Burton Museum:
This is...not. Claimed to be 1956...
The OP does resemble Burton's 1949 signature in his copy of A Phoenix too Frequently, also from The Burton Museum. Burton stopped this style well before 1952 as seen on checks and documents. Again the wrong year for the style, like the Ringo.
Below is Richard's 1951 signature on memorabilia from The Shakespeare Memorial Theatre.
-
-
This is James Mason c. 1978:
This is...not.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- …
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
