KING OF POP SIGNATURE AUTOGRAPH FAKE?

Tags: MICHAELJACKSON, MJ

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by bernie chatzky on February 8, 2015 at 1:11pm

I am no expert at all, but looking at another exemplars on the net this one looks ok.

I am still puzzled at your frequent postings asking if it's real or not?

Wouldn't be easier if you pay for a quick opinion to like psa/dna or mister Epperson?

Where did you find this one?

Do you have some of your own you already purchased?

Sorry for so many questions, I am just curious that's all, enjoy your sunday.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on February 8, 2015 at 1:34pm

There are multiple pen lifts on this one (meaning too many stops and start back ups, where they lifted the pen and restarted). I count 5 or 6 alone just in the Jackson part (without the star). The L in Love is also hideous (as is the rest of the print in Love always). Its no good.

Put a little bit of work into learning the autograph your looking for - it will go a long way in the end for you... instead of asking on every single MJ you like. People get a little annoyed when someone doesn't try to learn a sig at all, and just want people to find them an "MJ". A real MJ usually costs as well. (usually---sometimes people get lucky and find a cheaper one, but its rare)

-w

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on February 8, 2015 at 1:50pm

Wascher, you took the words right out of my mouth.

I am glad I didn't "impulse" reply to a new thread that was just posted.

There are a few people who who opine frequently and freely, and sometimes we feel the same way you do, Wascher, that people don't want to take the time to learn anything. They just want a freebie to make a purchase.

Many collectors here, including our great Moderator Wascher, have spent years studying and we continue to study.

And we don't charge a penny for our assistance.

Please take that into consideration when posting a "Is this real" thread.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by bernie chatzky on February 8, 2015 at 2:08pm

You are correct Christopher W.

Wascher has to be applauded for his input and wisdom, he is sharp.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on February 8, 2015 at 2:12pm

It' s Mrs. Wascher

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on February 8, 2015 at 2:35pm

Ms. :)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on February 8, 2015 at 2:50pm

Sorry :)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by bernie chatzky on February 8, 2015 at 3:39pm

I am sorry, I have to apologize, I did not know it was a she.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on February 8, 2015 at 3:55pm

LOL its ok bernie :)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on February 8, 2015 at 4:23pm

Washer. I was having a chat with jan cogo about the stones. Anyway I said what does your husband think about your collecting and the response was my wife puts up with it. HA, in Australia Jans a girls name.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cogo on February 8, 2015 at 8:28pm

Yes, I´m a guy. At least the last time I looked, I will double check that and let you know if anything has changed... ;-)

Actually, Jan Cogo is just my alias. It´s the hero from my favorite tv-series from when I was a kid, called Starzinger (Spaceketeers in the US, Sci-Bots in the UK):