Is Your Autograph Real?
Get Opinions from Members.

What's new in your collection?

How about an ongoing thread to highlight the new additions to your collection?

Whether it's a through-the-mail freebie or a big buck acquisition... it's all good. Show us what you got!

42 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on April 16, 2015 at 7:29am

That's awesome.how bout selling it to me now.cmon,you just got it.you can't be to attached to it yet.lol.seriously great piece! Congrats!!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J.Seah on April 17, 2015 at 12:01pm

Thanks Paul!! I deeply attached to this piece already. :)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on April 16, 2015 at 2:49pm

Here's my just framed lennon sig.circa 74'

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 3 MB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on April 16, 2015 at 2:50pm

Here's another closeup of sig

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 3.2 MB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Chris David on April 16, 2015 at 5:19pm

holy crap that nirvana cymbol ! bought these from a guy who won a I heart radio contest to go bowling with the black keys. when i met dan he was a jerk. doubt theres many authentic guitars out there.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cogo on April 16, 2015 at 8:20pm

I love it Paul. I think it´s framed in a very clever way with the photo surrounding the signature, if you get what I mean with my bad english... :-)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on April 17, 2015 at 3:09pm

I get it lol.I thinkwe both did great jobs framing the lennons using period photos based on the time period of the signatures.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cogo on April 16, 2015 at 8:22pm

Here´s my John Lennon, signed in 1963/64!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dane on April 17, 2015 at 5:38pm

I'm somewhat disappointed that someone felt it necessary to write in "1959" in blue over the other written date (1954), but still glad I won this. I definitely overpaid, and I'm seriously considering making a "cut" of the signature, just so I can get it authenticated without having to pay someone to authenticate a bunch of other random names that signed the page.

I'll probably never know for sure if it's authentic (the writing looks extremely fancy for a 13-yr-old), but this would be arguably one of the earliest known examples of a tough signature missing from most Cubs collections: Ken Hubbs.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Scott Paul on April 18, 2015 at 7:49am

Would't they just authenticate the one signature without doing the others? I have never bothered to have anything authenticated so not sure but would think i you asked they might.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dane on April 18, 2015 at 4:05pm

I've asked before. The answer has always been no. The strangest part is when the item is a minor league (or in this case little league) item, where it's very likely that the authenticator doesn't even look at the non-key signatures due to lack of exemplars.