Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 20, 2023 at 4:10pm

not in my opinion, I see issues with this

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 20, 2023 at 4:15pm

I agree. Not authentic IMO. That’s the only signature?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Autographtastic on September 20, 2023 at 5:04pm

Good thing I asked then. Yeah, that's the only sig. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 20, 2023 at 5:12pm

Not for me, agree with the others. Starts off bad, follows through.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Autographtastic on September 22, 2023 at 4:45am

It sold for about £1200 with the BP.

Was it done by the same forger as this set? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 22, 2023 at 8:28am

Yes, I believe so. Good catch. That’s why I asked if it was the only signature. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 22, 2023 at 8:31am

Agree, several characteristics in common apart from the "P".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 22, 2023 at 9:02am

What do you think? The forger missed the ‘R’ this time around.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 22, 2023 at 9:05am

I was sold on the "C's" and that second "a".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yony Mark on October 6, 2023 at 5:01am

I get that the upper one is a forgery, what about the lower one?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on October 6, 2023 at 7:37am

The lower one is from a full set of forgeries. Both Maccas are from the same forger.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yony Mark on October 6, 2023 at 8:05am

Thanks for the info :) Yeah, makes sense... both of these forgeries share the same problematic traits.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page