Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John H on March 14, 2014 at 3:16am

Not even close.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on March 14, 2014 at 3:42am

love that pose, though

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Null on March 14, 2014 at 8:29am

Saw that crap this morning, as ugly as it gets!

Where can I sign up to be a "Forensics Document Examiner" seems like an easy job! 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on April 3, 2014 at 4:31pm

Ebay seller Mikeg465 is still trying to sell his putrid-looking Mickey Mantle forgery.  Even the Ebay wannabe autograph collectors won't bid on this crap.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mickey-Mantle-Signed-8-x-10-Photo-with-COA-...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcel B. Matley on September 17, 2015 at 6:04pm

To Christopher Williams.

Sir, I joined primarily to express appreciation for your post on the Harralson letter. We belong to the same organization, and I have repeatedly written to our forum that forensic experts are not by that fact qualified to examine collectibles, that there are far more factors involved and that one ethically should stand by a letter of authentication or falsification forever. I am as a voice crying in the wilderness. If I were in charge of our journal, I would ask folk like yourself to provide papers warning against such unqualified incursions into another discipline and explaining the special ethical rules and legal obligations involved.

Thanks for a very fine little evaluation on an embarrassing opinion.

Regards,

Marcel B. Matley

• ▶ Reply