We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

I don't believe in this one. Has a COA from Todd Mueller which not really makes it better. On the other hand I seldom saw his sig in the same style twice. Maybe it depends on his mood of the day.

What do you think!

Views: 98

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I would never drink from that well.

I don't totally discount things automatically that come from that source.  I have a couple of great items from there.  However, I would proceed with extreme care as it is generally mixed at any given time (at best).  

There are so many bad "Shatner" items I can't choose one to post as an example.

I'm sure.   It's confounding to me.  

p.s. If in doubt in this case, I'd say pass it by.

I subscribe to all you wrote.

Besides Mueller, do you have doubts in the sig itself?

Yes. I think it is a mess.

Thanks, Eric. Again you saved me money.

Most welcome. Every time someone asks me to look at something from there, it has never yet been good. And as the Gleason's from that source regularly share qualities not seen elsewhere else IMO, I don't look. There will be something good, but I'd rather not dig through a pile of whatever to find it. And that COA is not something I'd want connected to anything I own.

Agreed. It's a poor forgery. That S isn't even close.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service