It doesn’t look authentic to me.
I don't like it either.
I'm not a Beatles expert. They are not on my radar at all.. ive probably devoted 10 hours total in overall research so take this with a grain of salt ..
From what I know about lennons signature, "lennon specifically" the L is usually dominant compared to ennon.. in this case, "ennon" just seems way too wide, as if it dominates the L. I hope this makes sense but thats what I see..
I Like it , the flow is good & from 1964 /65 , I've seen much worse Lennon's offered by top Dealers & of course genuine only to be said not right , all depending on the signing but the smaller O in john fits nicely as a film programme from 1964 sold recently with the same smaller O in john too , Looks Good IMO & a very clear example , others might not feel the same but its genuine .
It has certain elements that look vaguely plausible but it is far too jagged to be genuine in my view.
I dont like it
This is not real.
Nothing is real ! 100% .
© 2023 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by