Authenticity is Everything
John Lennon signed cut
This looks good to me, but I'm always a little wary of uninscribed cuts. Does anyone see any red flags?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on
-
I think it has traits that are very similar to the John signature from the Scream magazine insert.
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
Very specific dot in the "h" upstroke after the vertical and downstroke.
-
Permalink Reply by MrKite1970 on
-
I found this on Mr. Caiazzo‘s site and the dots are very similar to the Scream signature.
-
Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on
-
That's a rather odd looking Lennon, especially the "e". A lot more dots than mine from what I presume is a similar period (early 64)
-
-
I'm sorry, The Ciazzo and yours too.
-
Permalink Reply by spaceman on
-
Here is a genuine 1964 Lennon signature. The dots are part of the signatures flow. I would say the dots in the OP have been added after it was signed. IMO it is a fake.
-
-
Agreed.
-
-
That looks fluid and live - the dots we are talking about look more deliberate as suggested and perhaps even added. They don't appear a natural or organic part of the signature.
-
-
You mean mine, Frank's or both? I agree that the dots in Frank's look pretty natural too. Just a lot of them.
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
Agreed
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
