We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

a few month ago i posted a discussion on how id sent an image of this Hendrix signature from e bay to PSA for a quick opinion and they came back likely not genuine and how Roger Epperson had in the meantime passed it as genuine 

what a surprise to find that now its in the hands of a big autograph dealer at over three times the price its now passed PSA with flying colours and is fully certificated ..how odd 

Views: 2223

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They used to bring in JSA and do mass authentications at a local place. They recently stopped that practice and now they ask you to send them items and they will send them to PSA.Funny how PressPass has many PSA authenticated items that don't seem to look quite the same as all others do.
I'm just now reading this Sunday night. But that just sounds so shady. And the thing is...PressPass could even charge you LESS than what PSA would charge you in order to entice you to go through PressPass because I'm sure PressPass gets a big discount from PSA. For example, PressPass could charge a person maybe 80% of the price you would normally pay PSA. That is because PressPass probably gets about a 50% discount from PSA. So PP would still make a profit on the deal.

I say this because I recently bought a high-end item through a big dealer, but the item had no TPA's LOA to back it up. However, the dealer was promoting that they were soon having JSA come to their store to authenticate many items. The dealer agreed to have JSA authenticate the item (a baseball) when JSA came in for a visit. It was a baseball that would normally cost $300 to authenticate, but the dealer told me that JSA would only charge them $150; so that's all the dealer charged me for the JSA LOA.

So I am guessing 50% discounts for dealers might be the norm, possibly...if they are a big client.

That really sucks, but it goes to show just how worthless PSA QOs really are.  I might also be suspicious of them flunking something so that they could tip off someone else to buy an item like this.  Nothing seems to low to go.

they are in a prime position for that i wouldnt put it past them or at least some rogue employees

It's hard to miss a Mantle. Got a pic of it?

I wonder how often QAs are done by cell phone? If you don't zoom in to confirm your opinion, you can miss things, especially if it's a signed photo.

That's slowly signed? That looks pretty good to me, but I don't know Mantle as well as others here. 

Honestly in my opinion that Mantle looks authentic. Maybe the marker used was running out of ink when originally signed or maybe fading has occurred. The rest of the autograph looks typical Mantle

I didn't know they certified ones that good. The high-volume GAI Mantle forgeries I'm familiar with look like these, which I became aware of in about 2009:

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/the-gai-mantle-dimag...

It's really scary if they can be signed that close in volume.

Wow. Have they been discussed here?
Definitely one of the closer-to-authentic ones that GAI has passed, at least from what Ive seen.
Do you have a clearer scan? I tried to blow up the image but it is very blurry.

Anyway, I zoomed in on the last name M and on second thought it does look like it could have been signed a bit slowly. Hard to tell with the scan.
Attachments: No photo uploads here
The second one definitely doesnt look authentic. To my eye, the first one looks fine at first but once you look closer at the other letters you can see some signs of slowness. Also you make the argument that the t in Mantle is atypical. Scary to see how good some forgers are.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service