I find this story interesting for two reasons, One, it involves an incredible collectable. A signed letter from Neil Armstrong along with a vial of moondust. Two, it involves a proactive lawsuit, which I never understand. The last time there was one of those, I think it involved Robin Thicke (being thick) proactively suing the estate of Marvin Gaye so they couldn’t claim his song “Blurred Lines” was a rip off of “Gotta Give it Up” (it didn’t work, as the Gaye estate did sue, and won $10 million).
A Tennessee woman recently proactively sued NASA, so that she could keep a vial of dust from the moon that Armstrong gave her as a gift. He was supposedly a family friend, and her mother gave her the tube of lunar sand when she was 10-years-old, and it’s priceless (although I’m sure if somebody offered her a million bucks she’d take it). There’s also a signed letter, which would make this a nice set of items for some collector with a lot of cash.
A legal expert I spoke with (okay, a lawyer friend of mine I called up), said that it’s not uncommon to proactively do something like this, because it can save a lot of money if NASA came calling (or suing) when you put said item up for sale. He said it’s most common with contracts. And since NASA has seized rocks from the moon from private citizens previously. In 2011, a 74-year-old woman had trouble with lunar material she had gotten from her husband, an engineer on the Apollo 11 mission. That case is slightly different, as NASA claimed it was stolen. You might think NASA is being a bit...greedy with this philosophy but the reason lunar samples are the property of the government is because scientists research dangers of moon dust
The signature was easy to authenticate, but analyzing the “moon dust” would be a lot harder. We’ll see how this all shakes out when the woman decides to sell or auction off the item. My guess is Keith Richards will buy the vial and snort it.