Comment by roger epperson on October 4, 2010 at 3:06pm

Wow Doc,
I am not even close to an expert on him but I think even I could see that one from another zip code away!

Comment by Stephen Duncan on October 4, 2010 at 3:13pm

Holy Baloney.

Comment by BallroomDays67 on October 4, 2010 at 3:42pm

"You request an autograph"?

Comment by Dr. Richard Saffro on October 4, 2010 at 3:59pm

Chris.................great contribution. Good thing the Mantle bat was accompanied by a COA. Dick Saffro

Comment by john reznikoff on October 4, 2010 at 4:55pm

My dog blindfolded could do a better job

Comment by Rick Badwey on October 4, 2010 at 7:05pm

That Lincoln could have been signed by another Abe Lincoln who mistakenly dated it 1860, when he meant July 10, 2010 hahahahahahaha

Comment by Bill Panagopulos on October 4, 2010 at 7:20pm

Doc, I rarely comment on material offered by others, but those two items are the worst pieces of sh_t I've seen in a long time.

Comment by scott on October 4, 2010 at 8:14pm

Bill is awesome. Your comments make me laugh. I hope the autographs that I purchased make you laugh.

You learn more from screwing up than doing things right. I am learning a lot from my mistakes.

Comment by Rick Badwey on October 5, 2010 at 4:52am

I know who Travis is referring to. He is in CA (careful about mentioning names). I have purchased and sold things with him and always been happy. The dealer may allow him to post their items on his site. What does either party have to lose? As long as the item is represented accurately and is authentic, that is fine. He does not state the item is his, so there is no misrepresentation. I actually purchased one of my favorite pieces from him at a super price and was offered double. It is in my collection. Auction houses also use reserves, which people complain about. But, if those people put their own stuff for sale, they would want their stuff protected. No different

Comment by Rick Badwey on October 5, 2010 at 6:42am

Ironically, I framed a similar autograph (but real) and dated May 30, 1860. Apparently, this guy copied it from another item, but very poorly!

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page