All right, you sucked me into spending a few hours banging out a few images to show some history of the autograph that I have been most connected to, at least for authentication purposes.

Image one shows his early full signature with nearly every letter, Image 2 shows how the letters started falling away, but the A is still there and mostly fully formed with the same turn that we see in his H. Image 3 is his more modern signatures and most like what you might get today, while image 4 consists entirely of Official Pix signed items.

  

Views: 9436

Replies to This Discussion

+1

This was his reply when I pointed out he had been rumbled by this study

"

New message from: philip0310 Top Rated Seller(3,100Red Star)

i am aware of this study - my example has a dedication ( concealed under the mount ) on the page which makes it a lot easier to prove that it is authentic given that there is more hand writing to examine. My example is authentic.

Thanks for your interest."

Has Master Chuka weighed in on the blue personalized Ford? :-)

I can if you would like.

THEY ARE ALL, EVEN THE PERSONALIZED PIECES.......FORGERIES FROM THE EXACT SAME HAND.

There is not a shadow of doubt in my mind. 

They are blatantly wrong, in my world they are like Banana Mantles or Chalton Hestons 

Thanks, Pete. My goodness, this really is a wake up call.

How bout this guy
Attachments: No photo uploads here

Not one that I would want, not a very nice signature, and not one I would put my name on as 100% authentic, but it is likely real.

All of the CA sigs pretty much look the same. Weird.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service