We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

James Dean as "Jimmie Dean"—Is it real?

wonder about these too

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

007.jpg, 468 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Abcd on August 10, 2018 at 7:48am

Autograph authentication is not just about the autograph itself. Providence in just as important, especially when a evaluating something so rare and desirable.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 10, 2018 at 8:08am

Provenance can be a part of the puzzle; it is great when it is actually meaningful or even photographic (with the signed item showing clearly & preferably as below), but the signature must present correctly. The second photo is useless - That's me and Byrne but it doesn't prove(ance) I got it signed by Byrne at all. The autograph is more useful there.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Scott Paul on August 10, 2018 at 8:47am

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by caron brown on August 10, 2018 at 9:04am

whats this mean thanks

Permalink Reply by Scott Paul on August 10, 2018 at 9:20am

Hi there Caron: "+1" when it appears under a reply means the person is in agreement with what the other person said. In this case I agree with Eric's observations about provenance.

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 10, 2018 at 9:23am

Pardon - "uninscribed"...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on August 10, 2018 at 9:13am

Then stroke a check and buy it.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Abcd on August 10, 2018 at 7:36am

There are UACC dealers who will give you a quick opinion; however, I wouldn't waste the £10. James Dean autographs go for £2000 plus. Would you buy it?