Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Andrew Alderton on April 6, 2019 at 6:00pm

Thanks Seamus! I thought it could be as well. Anyone else have an opinion?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on April 6, 2019 at 9:26pm

Looks good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on April 6, 2019 at 10:55pm

I also think its good. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on April 7, 2019 at 12:22am

For me is terrible ... And maybe not authentic... 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on April 7, 2019 at 12:24am

well it isnt an attractive looking piece for sure, but a more attractive piece would command a hugh premium

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on April 7, 2019 at 2:41am

there are lots of copies / prints around of this style signed photo it seems to be a favourite for fakers so make sure it is actual pen signatures try get a hold of it in person before buying, a similar three signature red pen signed copy was doing the rounds three or four years ago from dubious sources 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mistytdog on April 7, 2019 at 2:07pm

Whose signature is the bottom one? Doesn’t look like anyone in the band.. it’s not moon , it’s not entwistle...highly doubt this is real... Pete usually signs more of last name and daltrey is a mess.. I would avoid this one....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2019 at 4:40pm

That must be the Daltrey folks are saying is a mess? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Corey Moylan on April 7, 2019 at 7:10pm

I think I now side with mistydog. After a second looks, the John and ‘Roger’ aren’t good, which makes me believe the Pete isn’t as well. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by marc e on April 7, 2019 at 8:08pm

people forget john was an artist his sig was really good and consistant he painted did album covers

I didn't john and roger is smushed

to many factors  against theres better out there

• ▶ Reply