Beatles signed program from tour with Ray Orbison

Hi everyone,

I apologise for the poor images on this one (not mine). The Paul and Ringo are clearly rushed and incompletely signed, but my feeling is that these are okay. The program has also been signed by Gerry Marsden.

What are people's thoughts?

Thanks

Tags: Beatles, George, Gerry, Harrison, John, Lennon, Marsden, McCartney, Paul, Ringo, More…Starr, The

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by fab432 on September 26, 2019 at 11:57am

Let’s just say I wouldn’t waste any time or money acquiring this set of autographs !!!! All bad IMHO.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Autographtastic on September 26, 2019 at 12:50pm

Thanks, I'll wait to hear what a few more people think.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on September 26, 2019 at 1:20pm

Not authentic IMO. Poor forgeries.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 26, 2019 at 3:30pm

Nor for me - every sig is strange. Hard pass.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on September 26, 2019 at 10:19pm

I'm leaning toward genuine. While condensed and rushed, they're not strange or fraudulent, clearly of the signatures 1963 transition. My hunch is they're authentic Beatle signatures.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Autographtastic on September 27, 2019 at 4:25am

Thanks to everyone for their views. I thought the autographs would divide opinion, although I wasn't expecting so many people to dismiss them outright. I'm comfortable with the Lennon and Harrison. The Ringo, although missing Starr and being rushed off at the end, actually fits the traits of several authentic Ringo's that I looked at. McCartney is the sloppiest but still has plenty going for it. If you were going to forge him why would you leave out the last three and a half letters?