Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 20, 2019 at 11:29am

Same hand? Look at the "rg" and "ng" connections, and others. What do others see? I am learning...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 20, 2019 at 5:34pm

I see this "connection" or transition shape in the "M" as well...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MichaelGR on November 20, 2019 at 2:06pm

It looks good. No qualitative superior set, but authentic. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 20, 2019 at 4:58pm

I suppose I just don't like these. :/

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on November 20, 2019 at 5:00pm

Isn’t the J in John a little unusual?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 20, 2019 at 5:01pm

I think so James, but I am learning.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by fab432 on November 20, 2019 at 5:06pm

I’m not liking this set.  The n in John appears to bd the same as the n in Ringo and the tails on the G’s in George look like Aspinall signatures 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 20, 2019 at 5:07pm

I think it looks strange

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 20, 2019 at 5:14pm

Too many coinciding angles and flavors for me. Is this Neil or what, Mal? Or...? The "hn" and the "M"...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 20, 2019 at 5:26pm

It looks strange to me too. All of the examples I have from January of ‘63 have a different style G to start George’s signature. It isn’t Neil or Mal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on November 20, 2019 at 5:27pm

That leaves "Or...?" which is what I was afraid of.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Susanne DeKerk on November 20, 2019 at 10:05pm

Nice set.

In the late 1962 and early 1963 years, some letters looked identical,

especially the 'N' of Lennon and Ringo.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page