This autograph supposedly has a COA from Epperson. 
Sorry, but the scribble can't be real?

Views: 612

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The "AUL" have fairly real characteristics but not Paul's flow. The rest of the autograph is a hot mess IMO.

No way. Bunch of nonsense. I can't believe Roger passed this - QO or otherwise. 

Let’s see the COA from Roger. I think we might be surprised on this one.

You may be right. It’s above my pay grade. 

Does it really matterWould it change your mind? Pity those it would. What do your eyes say? I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole no matter who said what.

I don't believe it has good Roger papers. 

"..,The rest of the autograph is a hot mess IMO...."

This changes? It is what it appears. No more no less. 

Imagine trying to sell it. 

I wouldn't buy it or sell it. I wouldn't recommend buying it in most cases.

Everything after "Paul" is a hot mess. It doesn't mean it's not real, even though it doesn't look real to me, but it's unidentifiable IMO as being by McCartney. The last part of the underscore looks similar to McCartney's but that's not hard to duplicate.

"Paul" has some of his characteristics. 

Unidentifiable is correct! 

Unless someone posted a photo of this being signed or some solid piece of provenance,  a coa wouldn't cut the mustard.

The autograph was offered in Austria.I've never seen a COA from Roger, probably there isn't one.I think it's all been said here. Another pointless scribble.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service