Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Justin on November 27, 2012 at 11:01am

lol jealous about what? this makes no sense at all for Bush to say this. Jealous of all the money he's going to make perhaps?? i seriously dislike that guy right now. he really believes Michael signed all these things doesn't he . he's up to his neck in deceit.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michelle on November 27, 2012 at 9:48pm

I don't know why he used that word in particular, but he also wrote a response quoting "haters and jealous people" on his page last week when he was being very aggressive with fans posting things he disagreed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BreakOfDawn on November 26, 2012 at 7:34pm

Steve, can you ask Darren when the autographs were signed? In one sitting (if so what month/year) or if it was multiple times Michael was drugged and that "opportunity" was used throughout the years since the autographs date to 80/90's.

Or is your relationship with Darren fried now?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 26, 2012 at 9:32pm

Sandy,

A couple weeks ago, I let Darren Julien know about a forgery a member posted from one of his auctions. He said he'd remove it and said:

"Thanks Steve.  Please always let me know when there is concern.  I always trust you."

Since I told Darren my concerns about the Tompkins & Bush sale, his feelings seem to have changed. I'd say he has no interest in communicating with me, but if he does, he can email me. After what he apparently told DB, I don't trust talking to him by phone.

But Sandy, why even bother following that excuse? I don't know anyone but Julien's who thinks these Michael Jacksons are real. They don't look anything like the Michael Jackson autographs we know.

And here's the bigger problem for Julien's: If these autographs that Bush said Michael Jackson signed for him aren't real, everything Tompkins and Bush has sold through Julien's will be under a cloud of suspicion. And that cloud could extend to what Julien's has sold from other consignors, since we all agree these highly questionable MJ autographs are something Julien's should have caught.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manu on November 26, 2012 at 9:40pm

Steve you are raising a good point, as much as noone ever thought of questioning Bush/thompkins integrity, we are now in a big doubt over all of this. 

Me i would like to know how Bush got all those items back from MJ. If roberto cavalli designed (and he did) a michael outfit, MJ paid for it (unless given) but then why would Michael send the outfit back to its creator? 

this looks really weird to me. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TeamMichael777 on November 27, 2012 at 9:14pm

Manu, Bush is the caretaker of these costumes, i suspect its Bush who has been selling many of the MJ costumes via Juliens for many years. This is what Karen Faye tweeted when news of the auction first reached her

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TeamMichael777 on November 27, 2012 at 9:15pm

Then there is also this, as the Estate executor wrote "foreword" for the book

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TeamMichael777 on November 27, 2012 at 9:19pm

IMO Bush has signed all these costumes to HIMSELF so no one can dispute ownership,, notice they are all signed to BUSH, not Tompkins,, If Michael did given these costumes away surely he would have signd Bush and Darren on ALL of them,, IMO Bush signed these after Tompkins passed away, so as to show ownership,, ownership by Bush,

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Manu on November 27, 2012 at 9:29pm

does that imply that Bush and estate got in a feud and the estate agreed to give up to Bush (for auction and book) some of Michael's clothes as a part of this agreement? interesting...

That would explain how bush got back all of those UNIQUE pieces that Michael possessed. (which includes stuff that Bush didn't make, and that MJ didn't sign)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by TeamMichael777 on November 27, 2012 at 10:36pm

Manu, it means Branca is such a snake all he cares about is getting his name all over the place, after all he did say to Mrs Jackson "I am Michael Jackson now" Branca cares about promotion only, he wrote the foreword, Bush was already in possession of the costumes, Branca does not care 2 cents about Michael, its a vendetta he as against Michael, you should read all the post we have on him on our site here, this is all from official documents http://teammichaeljackson.com/mj-estate-fraud Sorry everyone i know its off topic, but i need to answer this,, If you have any further Q's send me a private message here. MJ did not rehire Branca on the 17th, we have posted proof, MJ did not hire Branca full stop, keep an eye on Heal the world Foundation case, bribery etc, its all about to come out, January 13th court docs with be filed,

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Wendy Christine on November 28, 2012 at 12:10am

Amen sister.  

Not off topic as it directly relates to how these hundreds of fake MJ signatures are to be sold off come hell or high water in 4 days, and along with those forgeries will go Michael Jackson's personal (court ordered not to be sold by Darren Julien) property and another huge chunk of his righteous Legacy.  

Even the average observer must note that "someone" seems asleep at the wheel of navigating Michael's Legacy with the dignity, respect, creative excellence, perfectionism, generosity, humanity, ethics, and compassion he was known for.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Wendy Christine on November 28, 2012 at 6:05am

In keeping with that, they are selling MJ's gold History outfit which belongs in a museum - a Gianni Versace creation that somehow has a Tompkins Bush label in it.

(Wonder how long it takes to sew in a label?)

Check this out:

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 54
• 55
• 56
• 57
• 58
• …
• 226
• Next ›
• Page