Paul McCartney opinions

Been offered this signed photo which was obtained in person at Moscow 2003.

Tags: Beatles, McCartney, The, autograph, paul

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpeg, 45 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on April 21, 2016 at 3:32pm

I think its authentic

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 21, 2016 at 3:44pm

It looks off to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 21, 2016 at 3:59pm

I also doubt that it's authentic.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on April 21, 2016 at 4:17pm

well, my opinion is the one that counts! LOL. Seriously, McCartney is getting more and moe difficult to be sure of. I am usually the one that doubts, but this one still looks ok to me. who knows for certain.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on April 21, 2016 at 4:28pm

Some of these mccartneys are the flip of a coin.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on April 21, 2016 at 4:41pm

very true Paul

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on April 21, 2016 at 5:01pm

I agree with Steve and Ballroom, the more I look at it against other "similar" styles, the more it looks off.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on April 21, 2016 at 5:02pm

I know that the autograph is suppose to speak for itself, but I really think when it comes down to the questionable signatures I would want to hear or have the story behind it. I think a provenance or a chain of ownership is the only way you can feel comfortable (at least for me.)

Personally I agree this COULD be real, a lot of McCartney signatures have been toss ups for me lately. I personally don't like the photo so I would pass on it for that alone. Half this hobby is trusting your gut or you will never know if it is real or not. Buy ones without a doubt!:)