Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by james allen on September 26, 2024 at 8:18am

rushed but good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 26, 2024 at 9:00am

probably signed using their hand as the surface, but likely good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 26, 2024 at 9:14am

Agreed. They look like authentic signatures signed on an uneven surface.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on September 26, 2024 at 9:37am

plus one

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 26, 2024 at 10:14am

I agree with everyone else. As on-the-fly as they are, it only took a second to decide they were real.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 26, 2024 at 10:48am

Same here. Pretty? No, I don't think so, but I thought they were authentic immediately. The "P", "a", "l" and "R" and ease of the "ngo"  were most helpful. Value?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 26, 2024 at 7:02pm

Looks good...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on September 26, 2024 at 10:22pm

I actually like such rushed signatures. Maybe the Ringo is a bit too rushed but still interesting. I doubt the newspaper photo really shows this actual piece of paper being signed by Paul as I think it would have been neater if signed in or on a book. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on September 26, 2024 at 11:34pm

Actually I also like them as well, they have a rushed,authentic feel to them

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 28, 2024 at 5:59am

Exactly...to0 many "authentic" neat and "clean" Beatles "autographs" from 60+ years ago on the market today...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on September 28, 2024 at 7:18am

I agree. Far too many imo for them all to be genuine, month in and month out in auction houses even with all the corrects coas.  They didint sign that many.  

• ▶ Reply