Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by CJCollector on April 29, 2015 at 3:35pm

Paul, what's your opinion on that Ringo?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on April 29, 2015 at 3:38pm

Looks good to me!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on April 29, 2015 at 3:38pm

looks fine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 29, 2015 at 3:40pm

Agreed. Authentic, in my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Jones on April 29, 2015 at 3:46pm

Thanks for feedback everyone.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Jones on April 29, 2015 at 3:51pm

Any of you know much about rolling stones autographs? just wondering about these? apparently signed in 1966. 

Provenance/ Authenticity;

 

"The  Rolling Stones  lived occasionally in a house on the outskirts of Reading in Berkshire , England when I was a boy, quite close to where we used to live. My brother and I left our autograph books there with the housekeeper and a few months later when we picked them up they had been autographed by the band on one of their rare visits.

 

It is inscribed “Best Wishes the Stones” and autographed by Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Bill Wyman, “Charley Boy” Watts, and Brian Jones, (who died in 1969).

 

1966 was one of the bands’ most creative periods featuring  the release of celebrated singles such as “Paint it Black” and “19th Nervous Breakdown”.

 

Red and blue ballpoint on original card autograph book pages.

 

Warranted as authentic by James  Truscott, seller. April 2015"   

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on April 29, 2015 at 3:57pm

do you think there is any chance that these all could have been signed by the same person?  certainly seems like a possibility to me.  Even though they are "warrented as authentic by James Truscott, seller"

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on April 29, 2015 at 4:01pm

that Stones Set looks fishy.  I'd pass on it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Jones on April 29, 2015 at 4:02pm

Who is james truscott? just wondered if its meant to be someone known to be reputable authenticatior of stones autographs 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on April 30, 2015 at 11:10am

I think they definitely look like they were signed by the same person.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on April 29, 2015 at 5:03pm

Looks good...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on April 29, 2015 at 5:57pm

It's real.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page